We try to stay at Historic Hotels just because we love to see the restoration/ preservation and see all the history.
Some do it better than others, but we are truly confused why this is considered a historic landmark? It’s old, for sure- but it does not honor the Historic Landmark title. The main lobby has some nice furniture and all kinds of pictures of politicians/celebrities. It was unclear whether these people had actually visited the hotel or not because the plaques just told you who they were, not stories about the visits. There is a strange film that I guess was supposed to look like stained glass on the windows by the doors. The rooms are tiny and not even close to restored. The furniture is cheap 80’s oak, and the bathroom is so tiny, hard to change your mind in let alone your clothes. It had cheap tile, and the tiniest builder grade sink. The shower head hit my husband in the lower chest. The bed was comfortable enough, and the water was hot. The breakfast was so sparse we decided to go out to find breakfast. The kid at the front desk was not rude, but certainly not hospitable. Just a disappointment over all.